Jump To Navigation
  • NELA
  • Board Certified Texas Board of Legal Specialization
  • TELA Texas Employment Lawyers Association
  • HYLF
  • Superlawyers
Restaurant managers accused of horning in on tips

By L.M. Sixel

chron.com

July 25, 2003

AFTER receiving good service in a restaurant, most of us assume the waiter will receive the tip we leave.

But not necessarily. In some cases, the money winds up in the pockets of managers.

In January, the Labor Department forced Sam's Boat on Richmond Avenue to pay $112,702 in back wages to 48 employees after an investigation revealed the restaurant required its waiters and waitresses to give 3 percent of their tips to managers.

After that dispute was settled - without Richmond SB Interests admitting any liability - two more complaints have popped up.

Earlier this month, Willie G's, Landry's Restaurants and the River Oaks Grill were sued for allegedly forcing their employees to contribute a portion of their earnings to their bosses.

Martin Shellist, an employment lawyer with Shellist, Lore & Lazarz who filed the lawsuits, said the practice has become more common as restaurant owners try to devise ways to keep their managers happy and productive.

Under the wage and hour laws, tip pooling is permitted if employees receive more than $30 a month in tips. The money can then be distributed to waiters, waitresses, busboys and bartenders, but not managers.

And if employers count tips toward meeting their obligation to pay the minimum wage of $5.15 an hour, employees must be allowed to keep the gratuities.

One of the lawsuits alleges that employees at River Oaks Grill are required to give the general manager 2 percent of their total net sales after every shift except Monday evenings. The suit contends the salaried manager, who is not entitled by federal law to tips, keeps a portion of the money for himself.

"At the end of the night, the manager would say: `What did you make me tonight?' " said Daryl Sinkule, an employment lawyer at Shellist, Lore & Lazarz which is representing four waiters and one former waiter at the well-known River Oaks restaurant.

Lionel Schooler, an employment lawyer at Jackson Walker in Houston and who represents River Oaks Grill, said he hasn't seen a copy of the lawsuit.

But he said he believes the way the restaurant compensates its employees complies with federal labor laws. Like many restaurants, the River Oaks Grill has an arrangement that provides tips to those who are eligible to receive them,which includes bartenders, bus boys and sometimes the maiter d'.

But the manager doesn't receive tips, he said, and the restaurant plans to contest the complaint once it receives a copy.

While Chris Tripoli, president of the food service consulting company A'la Carte in Houston, said he has heard of restaurants that let top managers share in the tip pool, he said it's not a good management practice.

Tips are meant to be spread out to the staff involved in customer service, he said. And if managers are siphoning off some of the tips, the good waiters will quit to work at a restaurant that doesn't do that.

But he added that some of his clients do allow hands-on, lower-level managers to participate in the tip pool. They're hourly wage workers who also work as the shift leader or trainer.

It's a way to cross train employees and provide some means of upward mobility, he said.

Seven current and former employees at Willie G's in Galveston also allege that they must contribute 3.5 percent of their total gross sales during each shift to a shift pool. The money is then divided among bus boys and bartenders as well as managers and other employees who aren't eligible to receive tips, such as silverware rollers, salad makers and other kitchen workers, according to the lawsuit that was filed recently in federal court in Galveston.

The employees also allege in the lawsuit that when Willie G's puts on banquets, the automatic gratuity is distributed to managers and other employees who are not eligible for tips, such as kitchen employees.

He said hopes the courts will find that Landry's Restaurants and the River Oaks Grill violated federal wage and hour laws on tipping, which would make the employees eligible to receive the full mininum wage of $5.15 an hour plus any overtime they have coming. Restaurants can pay their tipped employees a lower minimum wage of $2.13 an hour as long as the tips bring their wages up to the federal minimum wage.

Amy Kitchens said that when she worked at Willie G's in Galveston as a waitress she had to give up 3.5 percent of her total sales at the end of her shifts - even when customers left no tips. But when she found out that "salad ladies" and the employees who refill ice weren't getting a cut, she complained.

Kitchens, who left the restaurant in the spring, said she has also worked during private banquets and discovered after handling the check at one buffet last fall that she and two other servers were shorted by about $200 in gratuities. She said she complained to the corporate office and was later removed from the list of employees eligible to work banquets.

Steve Scheinthal, general counsel of Landry's Restaurants, said he hasn't seen a copy of the lawsuit but said that to his knowledge, no managers participate in a tip pool in the locations that use a pooled tipping system.

Banquets are different, he said. When employees are hired to work a banquet, they're paid the minimum wage. The tip the host pays isn't really a gratuity, said Scheinthal, preferring to call it a "labor charge."

That money can be spread around to many employees, including the sales person who booked the party, he said.

He said he can't comment on allegations that pooled tips went to kitchen employees because he said he doesn't have enough information.

"We run a clean practice and we know what our obligations are and we make sure everyone is in compliance with the rules and regulations," Scheinthal said.

Successes

  • $730K settlement awarded in gender discrimination case

    A federal court jury Friday returned a $730,000 gender discrimination judgment in favor of Surina Dixon - who was hired as women's basketball coach at Texas Southern University in March 2008 but left in a contract dispute without coaching a game.

  • $3.2M settlement awarded in sexual harassment case

    A former Brazoria County judge has been ordered to pay more than $3 million to three women who say he sexually harassed them while he was on the bench.

  • $875,000 Settlement in Whistleblower suit against the City of Houston

    The city council agreed to pay $875,000 to a veterinarian who successfully sued the City of Houston; after he was unfairly fired from his job at the city's animal pound for complaining of animal abuse at the kennel. The jury found him retaliated against by his superiors who fired him with prejudice.

  • Wage & Hour Settlement in the amount of $574,000

    Our firm represented 70 current and former servers of a restaurant chain that required its servers to share a portion of their tips with the managers and owners of the restaurant.

  • $375,000 Jury Verdict in a Gender Discrimination suit against the Houston Police Department

    The jury found a female HPD cadet was discriminated against because of her gender when she was fired from the cadet class. HPD said she violated the Cadet Code of Conduct by carrying a gun in her personal car; however there were previous cases where male cadets were only reprimanded and not terminated.

  • Sexual Harassment Settlement in excess of $300,000

    Our firm represented several employees who were sexually harassed by a male supervisor. After obtaining a letter of determination from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, our firm was able to negotiate a settlement in excess of $300,000.

  • Verdict in excess of $300,000 in National Origin Discrimination Case

    Our firm represented a former dental professor at the University of Texas Health & Science Center who was discriminated against based on his national origin. At trial, we provided evidence of racial slurs, retaliation, and disparate wages in comparison to white professors. After two days of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the professor and awarded mental anguish damages in excess of $150,000.

  • $250,000 Jury Verdict in a Racial Discrimination suit against Montgomery County Sheriff's Department

    The jury found the Lieutenant was demoted from a Detective to Recruiting because he is black. He was terminated six months after complaining to authorities. The jury agreed the termination was a form of retaliation and awarded him lost wages past and future.

  • $229,268 Jury Verdict in a Reverse Discrimination suit against the Houston Metropolitan Transit Authority ("Metro")

    A white male employee sued the Houston Metropolitan Transit Authority ("Metro") alleging race discrimination in violation of Chapter 21 of the Texas Labor Code. The employee was denied a promotion to the position of Superintendent despite being the most qualified person for the position. The jury found that the interview panel was tainted by a person on the panel, the second term president of the local chapter of the Conference of Minority Transportation Officials ("COMTO"), and an organization which promotes the creation of opportunities for minorities.

  • Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Settlement in excess of $150,000

    Our firm represented a male employee who was sexually harassed by another male employee at a construction company. We were able to open dialogue with the construction company and bring about a quick resolution for our client.

  • Wage & Hour Settlement in excess of $149,000

    Our firm represented 16 current and former waitresses at two popular bars that required their waitresses to work off-the-clock and to share a portion of their tips with members of management. The bar also failed to pay its waitresses overtime for hours they worked in excess of 40 in a work week. Our firm was able to demonstrate that the bar's actions were in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which resulted in settlement.

  • Arbitration award in excess of $120,000 in a Breach of Employment Contract suit.

    An employee of a Houston based company was terminated in breach of his employment contract. The company alleged that the employee had performance issues which allowed the company to terminate the employee under its "for cause" provision. Our firm was able to show that the alleged performance issues were false and that the company breached the employment agreement by terminating the employee prior to the expiration of the term of the agreement.

  • $115,000 Jury Verdict in a Racial Discrimination suit against the INS

    The jury found the INS discriminated against a black inspector. The inspector filed a complaint with authorities in the department for being passed over for promotion. The jury determined that passengers were solicited and asked to prepare written complaints against the employee to be used against him as a basis for termination. . The jury found the INS acted with prejudice toward the inspector.

  • $106,000 Jury Verdict in Wrongful Termination suit against the City of Houston

    The jury found the city acted with malice in firing a dog-catcher for reporting instances of animal cruelty and racial discrimination of Hispanic workers to a supervisor. Jurors concluded the city violated the state whistle-blower law, which prevents government agencies from retaliating against employees simply for reporting problems.

  • Wage & Hour Settlement in the amount of $100,000

    We filed suit on behalf of six servers of a fine dining establishment under the Fair Labor Standards Act, arguing that the restaurant's requirement that its servers share a percentage of their tips with the restaurant's manager was in violation of federal law. The parties were able to reach resolution of the matter at mediation.

  • Wage & Hour Settlement in the amount of $100,000

    The firm filed a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act on behalf of five current and former servers of a fine dining establishment, arguing that the restaurant violated federal law by failing to pay its servers overtime, requiring them to work off-the-clock, and requiring that its servers share a portion of their tips with the restaurant's manager on duty. After notice of the lawsuit was mailed to other current and former servers, an additional seven servers joined the lawsuit. The parties settled the case at mediation.

  • Wage & Hour Settlement in the amount of $95,000

    An employee of a communications company was terminated when he complained to management that he was not receiving overtime pay for hours he worked in excess of 40 in a work week. The company alleged that the employee was not entitled to overtime because he was exempt under the computer professional exemption to the Fair Labor Standards Act, and that the employee was terminated because he refused to sign a non-competition agreement. Our firm was able to demonstrate that the employee did not meet the duties of an exempt computer professional, which resulted in settlement of the matter.


Read More

EEOC

Shellist | Lazarz | Slobin is not affiliated with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Please click on the link to contact the EEOC.