Jump To Navigation
  • NELA
  • Board Certified Texas Board of Legal Specialization
  • TELA Texas Employment Lawyers Association
  • HYLF
  • Superlawyers
Employment Newsletter

Click here to sign up for our employment newsletter.

The Family and Medical Leave Act

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is a federal law providing qualified employees with unpaid time off from work to attend to certain family needs, including:

  • Birth or care of a child
  • Placing a child for adoption or in foster care
  • Caring for a newly placed child
  • Caring for a serious health condition of the employee or the employee's immediate family (spouse, child or parent)

The FMLA applies to local, state and federal governments, schools, public agencies and private employers who have at least 50 employees for at least 20 workweeks currently or in the previous calendar year.

In order for an employee to qualify for FMLA leave, the employee must:

  • Work for a covered employer
  • Have worked for the covered employer for at least 12 months prior to the requested leave
  • Have worked at least 1250 hours for the covered employer within the 12 month period prior to the requested leave
  • Work at a location where at least 50 employees are employed or within 75 miles of that location

Employees who meet these qualifications are entitled to up to 12 workweeks of unpaid FMLA time within a 12 month period. There are some restrictions on how this time may be used, however. Spouses who work for the same employer are entitled to a total of 12 workweeks FMLA time if the purpose for the leave is for the birth or care of a child; adoption or foster care; or care of a parent with a serious health condition.

Notice Requirement

If the leave is foreseeable, like if the employee has a scheduled surgery in two months, the employee may be required to provide up to 30 days notice to the employer before taking FMLA time.

However, if the leave is not foreseeable, the employee is expected to give notice as soon as practicable, which usually means notifying the employer verbally within 1-2 days of discovering the need to take FMLA time. The employee also can notify the employer of the desire to use time already taken off as FMLA time, so long as the employee provides notice within two business days of returning to work from the leave.

Medical Certification

In some instances, the employer may require the employee to provide documentation to show that the purpose of the requested leave is for a FMLA approved-purpose. This can include certification from a health care provider in instances when the employee is taking time off for his or her own medical care or for that of an immediate family member. However, the employee is not required to provide the employer with his or her medical records.

Job Restoration

An employee who takes FMLA leave is entitled to receive his or her job back or an equivalent position once the employee returns from leave. An equivalent position means one that offers the same salary, benefits and employment terms and conditions.

An exception to the job restoration rule exists for those who meet the definition of "key employees." Employers have the right to refuse to restore the positions of highly paid, salaried key employees if it would cause "substantial and grievous economic injury" to the employer's business operations to do so.

Health Benefits

While the employee is taking FMLA leave, the employer is required to continue providing health benefits to the employee. In turn, the employee is required to continue to pay his or her portion of the premium. Failure to do so can result in a loss of benefits. Employers also have the right to discontinue health benefits for employees who notify them they will not be returning at the end of their FMLA leave or who fail to return to work at the end of the leave period.

FMLA Employee Rights

Employees may not be discriminated or retaliated against by their employers for requesting or taking FMLA leave. Employers cannot use the time off to count against the employee in hiring, promotion, performance review or other employment decisions. Employees who feel their rights under the FMLA have not been upheld by their employer or who have suffered adverse employment decisions or have been discriminated against for taking FMLA time can file a complaint with the Wage and Hour Division of the US Department of Labor. Employees also may file a civil suit against their employer.

For more information on your legal rights under the FMLA, contact an experienced employment lawyer in your area today.

Meeting with Your Employment Law Attorney

To read and print out a copy of the checklist, please follow the link below.

Meeting with Your Employment Law Attorney

You can download a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader here

Copyright © 2008 FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business

DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent counsel for advice on any legal matter.

View Previous Months' Selections

Successes

  • $730K settlement awarded in gender discrimination case

    A federal court jury Friday returned a $730,000 gender discrimination judgment in favor of Surina Dixon - who was hired as women's basketball coach at Texas Southern University in March 2008 but left in a contract dispute without coaching a game.

  • $3.2M settlement awarded in sexual harassment case

    A former Brazoria County judge has been ordered to pay more than $3 million to three women who say he sexually harassed them while he was on the bench.

  • $875,000 Settlement in Whistleblower suit against the City of Houston

    The city council agreed to pay $875,000 to a veterinarian who successfully sued the City of Houston; after he was unfairly fired from his job at the city's animal pound for complaining of animal abuse at the kennel. The jury found him retaliated against by his superiors who fired him with prejudice.

  • Wage & Hour Settlement in the amount of $574,000

    Our firm represented 70 current and former servers of a restaurant chain that required its servers to share a portion of their tips with the managers and owners of the restaurant.

  • $375,000 Jury Verdict in a Gender Discrimination suit against the Houston Police Department

    The jury found a female HPD cadet was discriminated against because of her gender when she was fired from the cadet class. HPD said she violated the Cadet Code of Conduct by carrying a gun in her personal car; however there were previous cases where male cadets were only reprimanded and not terminated.

  • Sexual Harassment Settlement in excess of $300,000

    Our firm represented several employees who were sexually harassed by a male supervisor. After obtaining a letter of determination from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, our firm was able to negotiate a settlement in excess of $300,000.

  • Verdict in excess of $300,000 in National Origin Discrimination Case

    Our firm represented a former dental professor at the University of Texas Health & Science Center who was discriminated against based on his national origin. At trial, we provided evidence of racial slurs, retaliation, and disparate wages in comparison to white professors. After two days of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the professor and awarded mental anguish damages in excess of $150,000.

  • $250,000 Jury Verdict in a Racial Discrimination suit against Montgomery County Sheriff's Department

    The jury found the Lieutenant was demoted from a Detective to Recruiting because he is black. He was terminated six months after complaining to authorities. The jury agreed the termination was a form of retaliation and awarded him lost wages past and future.

  • $229,268 Jury Verdict in a Reverse Discrimination suit against the Houston Metropolitan Transit Authority ("Metro")

    A white male employee sued the Houston Metropolitan Transit Authority ("Metro") alleging race discrimination in violation of Chapter 21 of the Texas Labor Code. The employee was denied a promotion to the position of Superintendent despite being the most qualified person for the position. The jury found that the interview panel was tainted by a person on the panel, the second term president of the local chapter of the Conference of Minority Transportation Officials ("COMTO"), and an organization which promotes the creation of opportunities for minorities.

  • Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Settlement in excess of $150,000

    Our firm represented a male employee who was sexually harassed by another male employee at a construction company. We were able to open dialogue with the construction company and bring about a quick resolution for our client.

  • Wage & Hour Settlement in excess of $149,000

    Our firm represented 16 current and former waitresses at two popular bars that required their waitresses to work off-the-clock and to share a portion of their tips with members of management. The bar also failed to pay its waitresses overtime for hours they worked in excess of 40 in a work week. Our firm was able to demonstrate that the bar's actions were in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which resulted in settlement.

  • Arbitration award in excess of $120,000 in a Breach of Employment Contract suit.

    An employee of a Houston based company was terminated in breach of his employment contract. The company alleged that the employee had performance issues which allowed the company to terminate the employee under its "for cause" provision. Our firm was able to show that the alleged performance issues were false and that the company breached the employment agreement by terminating the employee prior to the expiration of the term of the agreement.

  • $115,000 Jury Verdict in a Racial Discrimination suit against the INS

    The jury found the INS discriminated against a black inspector. The inspector filed a complaint with authorities in the department for being passed over for promotion. The jury determined that passengers were solicited and asked to prepare written complaints against the employee to be used against him as a basis for termination. . The jury found the INS acted with prejudice toward the inspector.

  • $106,000 Jury Verdict in Wrongful Termination suit against the City of Houston

    The jury found the city acted with malice in firing a dog-catcher for reporting instances of animal cruelty and racial discrimination of Hispanic workers to a supervisor. Jurors concluded the city violated the state whistle-blower law, which prevents government agencies from retaliating against employees simply for reporting problems.

  • Wage & Hour Settlement in the amount of $100,000

    We filed suit on behalf of six servers of a fine dining establishment under the Fair Labor Standards Act, arguing that the restaurant's requirement that its servers share a percentage of their tips with the restaurant's manager was in violation of federal law. The parties were able to reach resolution of the matter at mediation.

  • Wage & Hour Settlement in the amount of $100,000

    The firm filed a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act on behalf of five current and former servers of a fine dining establishment, arguing that the restaurant violated federal law by failing to pay its servers overtime, requiring them to work off-the-clock, and requiring that its servers share a portion of their tips with the restaurant's manager on duty. After notice of the lawsuit was mailed to other current and former servers, an additional seven servers joined the lawsuit. The parties settled the case at mediation.

  • Wage & Hour Settlement in the amount of $95,000

    An employee of a communications company was terminated when he complained to management that he was not receiving overtime pay for hours he worked in excess of 40 in a work week. The company alleged that the employee was not entitled to overtime because he was exempt under the computer professional exemption to the Fair Labor Standards Act, and that the employee was terminated because he refused to sign a non-competition agreement. Our firm was able to demonstrate that the employee did not meet the duties of an exempt computer professional, which resulted in settlement of the matter.


Read More

EEOC

Shellist | Lazarz | Slobin is not affiliated with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Please click on the link to contact the EEOC.